Archive for the ‘Khazar’ Category

the Khazar plan

March 11, 2013

by David Holden
Saturday, March 9th, 2013
A Brief History of Khazars in the ‘Goldene Medin’>
Contributed by John Churchilly

“The Khazars – or Ashkenazis (Hebrew for German) how they call themselves today – are actually the descendants of ethnic Turk tribes that entered Europe as part of Attila’s hordes and their local Germanic rape victims. For speed and logistical reasons they couldn’t bring their women along, all the way from Mongolia, and had to ‘source’ them locally, usally by killing everybody else in the tribe.

Given how busy those Huns/Khazars were raping and pillaging, the fruits of those rapes ended up speaking Yiddish, a medivial Germanic dialect mixed with Turkish elements, and weren’t too attached to the traditional Hun /Khazar phallus cult, although some remnants of that obsession with the male genital can still be seen today in Ashkenazi subculture, especially Ashkenazi dominated pornography and male ‘enhancement’ products. Eventually, the Huns/Khazars converted to Talmudism, because that creed was far more palatable to both their Christian and Muslim neighbours, at a time when the Khazars were dominating the Eastern European part of the ancient silk road.” — Andrew Winkler

“Never in the history of our people have we been so safe and so successful and so well integrated as we are in the United States. The Golden Age in Spain had nothing on the 350 years we have spent in America. This is in fact, as our grandparents said, the ‘goldene Medin’ (the golden land)”. — JINSA

Years ago Benjamin Freedman said, “They rule America as monarchs“. “They” are the reason Sharon could boast, “We control America and they know it.” But most Americans do not know it. Just who are “they” and where did “they” come from? That is the purpose of this article — revealing the Khazars.

Americans should know Khazars secretly dominate every aspect of American life. They have infiltrated the upper levels of American government, industry, banking, finance, commerce, mass media, communications, real estate, merchandising, arts, education, sports, professional associations etc. This is not by chance or merit but by design, a careful preference in selection over many, many decades. “We have taken hold of the ends of the springs which move their mechanism. We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the cornerstones of a free existence.” (Italics are quotes from the Protocols.)

Khazars are a race that originated in the Black Sea area and migrated into Eastern Europe in the Dark Ages to an area called Khazaria. It was there that in the 700′s A.D., after a long war they were conquered by Islam and later adopted Judaism as their official religion. Around 1000 A.D. they migrated into Spain, were very prosperous but ousted after a century or two and went to Portugal. After a century or so they were ousted again and went to the Netherlands. The Netherlands prospered for about a century and the Khazars spread across Europe and then America. They were never in the Biblical Lands.

“Khazars” and “Jews” are not synonymous. Judaism is a religion going back to antiquity, earlier even than the beginnings of civilization. Its members have largely remained in the Middle East. Its scripture is the Old Testament of the Bible. By comparison, Khazars are recent cultural Jews. Their scripture is the Protocols to the Elders of Zion, the evil bible of modern Zionism which calls for a different global polity, a ruthless dictatorship. Its opening sentence reads, “It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good.” Thus in political matters, this race should be called Khazars not Jews.

Many Jews have been victims of the Khazars and many disavow Zionism. Nevertheless, the vast majority of Jews in Europe and America are Khazars and vice versa. Having no religious beliefs including an after life, Khazars focus entirely on worldly acquisitions especially money. “It is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, and to put in its place material needs.” They are largely an urban people located in cities; nature and natural resources are for privatization and profit. They are virulently anti-Catholic since the Church is their principal organized opposition, “The Russian autocracy, the one and only serious foe we had in the world, without counting the Papacy.”

Khazars are the heart of Zionism, supported by millions of Christians who commonly depend on them, one way or another, “The need for daily bread forces them to keep silence and be our humble servants.” Khazars also call themselves Ashkenazi to separate themselves from their “lesser brethren”, Sepphardim or Middle Eastern Jews. Historically, Khazars when they entered a society always gathered in their own ghettos with their own governments and became “black holes” of wealth by their predatory commercial and lending practices. Although they intermarried with other races, they did not assimilate.

The founders of America knew them well: Washington called them “the greatest enemy” to the new nation; Franklin called them “vampires”; Jefferson, “false citizens”; Madison, “money changers” and Jackson, “Ye breed of vipers”. At the time there were few in America. In the late 19th century, Khazars came to America by the millions as a result of Russian pogroms after an assassination.[1] This continued into the 20th century so that by the time of World War I there were about 3 million in America. They doubled their numbers in America during the 1930′s and 1990′s so that today of their world population of about 14 million (the same as pre-Holocaust(?)), over 6 million are in America or about 2% of the American population and control a majority of the nation’s wealth. By contrast African-Americans number nearly 40 million and control little of the nation’s wealth. Khazar-Americans came here with the wealth and financing amassed over millenia while African-Americans came here via the Khazar slave trade and were kept impoverished and uneducated for 300 years (the black goldene medin).

So, in about two hundred years, Khazars have become the richest and most powerful and influential minority in America, the most bountiful nation on earth. This is precisely what Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, Madison and Jackson feared. The brilliant Franklin said, “If they are let into the country, in two hundred years our children will be working in their fields while they sit in their counting-houses, rubbing their hands.” What extraordinary foresight! But let’s step back aways.

Around 1595 Amsterdam Khazars founded the Bank of England through William Patterson and began the Khazar banking of today, fiat money at interest, income taxes to pay the interest, fractional reserves and immense debt to finance war and governmental expenses instead of taxation. English national debt soared tenfold. “An exceedingly burdensome debit has been created and all the wealth of States flowed into our cash-boxes.”

Then around 1770 arose Mayer Amschel Rothschild, a colossus in the history of banking and finance. Rothschild was already rich in his late twenties from banking. He then solicited and became agent for Prince William IX of Hanau , one of the richest men in Europe, becoming vastly richer. One story is that Rothschild brokered the recruitment of 12,000 German soldiers (Hessians) for use by England in the American Revolution. Their pay disappeared; 7,000 were killed and the remaining 5,000 were abandoned in America where their descendants can be found today.

Rothschild organized the bankers and financiers of Europe into his preferred enterprise, an invisible monopoly. “Capital must be free to establish a monopoly of industry and trade: this is already being put in execution.” They financed (and fomented) wars because it filled their “treasuries” and opened the doors to government. They made vast loans to governments which provided them with an endless stream of interest. “These loans burdened the finances of the States with the payment of interest and made them the bond slaves of our bankers.” Their goal was to take control of all the money in the world and subjugate all mankind, the modern Zionist agenda described in the Protocols. “Nature herself has destined us to guide and rule the world.” And after two centuries they have succeeded (remember Franklin’s prediction).

The Khazar global bankers rule the world under the Khazar/Jewish Dynasty, the Rothschilds. Rothschild is quoted, “Let me control the issuance of a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” This is the key. Control of all the money and credit in the world, all untaxed. “A tax on capitalists diminishes the growth of wealth in private hands in which we have concentrated it.” It is “an aristocracy of money” involving super rich Khazars, the Khazar global bankers, their Federal Reserve and other central banks and their Protocols. “We shall establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of colossal riches, upon which even large fortunes will depend.”

“The pressure came from the Jews – all over the world, and in the face of it Mr. Ford was panic-stricken. He is one of the richest men in the world but he was made to feel that the Jews have more money and hence more power than he, and that their money and their power can be quickly mobilized against an opponent, and with crushing consequences.” (Moody Monthly Sept. 1927 on Ford’s “apology” to the American Jewish Congress.)
“Whoever controls the money, controls the flow of wealth.” (Fr. Coughlin on 1930′s radio.)

After the American Constitution became law, unifying American money, the Rothschild agent, Alexander Hamilton, in 1791 persuaded Washington to approve Rothschild’s Bank of the United States, the forerunner of the Federal Reserve, which took control of American money and Khazar-American wealth burgeoned. The Bank charter lapsed in 1836 but Khazar banking was now well established in America. It financed for Rothschild the Robber Barons (Rockefeller, Morgan, Carnegie, Harriman). Earlier, Rothschild had taken over the Bank of England as well as the Bank of France. He founded the Rothschild Dynasty and sent his five sons to the capitals of Europe to manage the financial affairs of the Dynasty. Then followed for the rest of the century all the wars and chaos described in the Protocols, bankrupting Europe.

“Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies. The system of banking is a blot left in our Constitution which, if not covered, will end in its destruction.” (Thomas Jefferson)

Sadly, humanity hoped the 20th century would bring peace but it would bring only more wars, even world wars, and chaos and the most dreadful arsenal of weapons ever conceived by man,”We will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international Super Government with submissiveness.” The League of Nations at Versailles was the first attempt at their Super Government, “All the States of Europe will be locked in our coil as in a powerful vice“; the United Nations was the second and the continental Unions the foundation for the third, “Our international rights will wipe out national rights.”

“Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce.” (President Garfield )

A few months later Garfield was assassinated like Lincoln, McKinley and Kennedy who also opposed the Khazar bankers. Today these bankers control all the money of the world including Russia and China. The most powerful central bank is the Federal Reserve which has always been owned and manipulated by the Khazar bankers. It finances their speculations around the world, backed by the money, credit and “guns of America”. It is directly responsible for World War I, the Crash of 1929, the Great Depression, the Asian Crisis and the coming Dollar Crisis.

“Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed has cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over. The sack of these United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history.” (Congressman McFadden of Pennsylvania in 1934, he died suspiciously at 60 in 1936 after several attempts on his life.)

Early in the 20th century, Khazar-Americans like Warburg, Brandeis, Untermeyer, Baruch and Meyer through their “panama” Wilson brought US the Federal Reserve, World War I, income taxes, and the popular election of senators; Morganthau and Baruch through FDR brought US World War II with Eisenhower and Clark leading the Allies, and Rothschild’s “panama” Johnson and Nixon with Kissinger brought US the Vietnam War. During World War I, three Khazar-Americans commanded the American war effort: Baruch over all industry, Warburg over all banking and Meyer over all war financing and added sedition laws (like today’s Hate Laws) to stifle complaints of their immense frauds like The Duplication of War Bonds (one for Khazar-Americans and one for government). Today the reins of our secret government are held by the likes of Wolfowitz, Pearl, Feith, Zacheim, Chertoff, Greenspan, Abrams, Bolton, Kristol, Kagan and on and on. They have many rich tax exempt foundations, factions and organizations supporting them. They have installed yet another “panama” in the White House and directed “the guns of America” at the Muslim world and oversee a gigantic fleecing of the American taxpayer in favor of Israel and Zionism. “We replaced the ruler by a caricature, a president, taken from the midst of our puppet creatures, our slaves, a puppet in our hands.”

Over the course of the 20th century, the most powerful industrial nation on earth; built by plentiful resources, ample farmland, temperate climate, cheap immigrant labor and unscathed by foreign war, has been utterly bankrupted by the Khazar bankers. “Economic crises have been produced by us by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation.” The greatest industrial nation in history has been liquidated, tens of millions of jobs lost, and the proceeds used for financial speculations around the world guaranteed by the Federal Reserve. “To complete the ruin of industry we shall bring speculation and transfer into our hands all the money of the world.” The American people haven’t a clue of the colossal tax free wealth in the tens of trillions the Khazars have amassed by defrauding them and their government especially in wartime yet the American people are beginning to wake up, noting that now Khazars seem to “own everything in America”. But Khazars believe we are too late.

The Federal Reserve is responsible for immense bubbles in the financial markets, housing and money supply and finances the Middle East wars that many predict will produce a “train-wreck” of the American economy and standard of living, “an economic crisis, which will stop dealings on the exchanges and bring industry to a standstill. Disorders and bankruptcy will be universal.” The states should plan to issue their own script as in the colonial days, “on the day after the political smash” of Washington.

“The growth of the Nation and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the world, a Government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men.” (Woodrow Wilson)

Khazar-Americans have a monopoly of all American mass media: movies, television, newspapers, books and magazines. “The Press is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people. It has fallen into our hands.” For generations they have “Pavlov-ed” US like dogs with a nonstop diet of their subliminal propaganda, from Gentlemen’s Agreement to Schindler’s List. The Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, like the murder of Rachel Corrie, is officially “closed” and “buried” by Washington. We are told to “Get over it”. But we are never allowed to “get over” German National Socialism, the Holocaust(?) and anti-semitism. “They have lost the habit of thinking. These hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims.”

And, as boasted in the Protocols, the Khazar bankers are completely invisible. “Who will ever suspect that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries?” Any reference to them is sneeringly disposed of as “conspiracy theory” or “anti-semitism”. “Anti- Semitism is indispensable for the management of our lesser brethren. This has formed the subject of repeated discussions amongst us.” In reality, guided by Rothschild’s Protocols, Zionism is the greatest conspiracy in history, a group of supremely organized and dedicated, even fanatical, people who by their control of the world’s money have access to unlimited credit and money for their global political and economic purposes. “Our widely conceived plan is already approaching the desired consummation. There now remains not much more for us to build up upon the foundation we have laid. Surely we shall not fail with such wealth to prove that all that evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit has served the cause of true well-being– the bringing of everything into order.” The Khazar New World Order!

They think of themselves as Ubermensch “Their mind is undeveloped in comparison with our mind.“, witness all their Nobel awards yet their chutzpah vastly exceeds their intelligence, witness the colossal bungle of their New Pearl Harbor on September Eleven, an impossible false flag hoax. It is also exceeded by their consummate evil, witness the thousands horribly murdered on September Eleven and the humanicide caused by their never-ending wars for profit. “It is from us the all engulfing terror proceeds. We are merciless.” Without the Khazars, America would have been a “goldene medin” for everyone; there was plenty for all.

“It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.” (George Washington)

Khazars dread two things above all else; ethnic cleansing and taxation. Like so often in the past, societies find it necessary to save themselves from their depredations. Americans must boycott all Khazar-American politicians and remove them from public office and demand the transfer of taxation from wages and sales taxes on necessaries to the vast untaxed trillions of wealth and property in America much of it held by the Khazar-Americans which has been used not for investment in America (and jobs) but for electioneering, propaganda and speculation, undermining the true welfare and prosperity of America.

Acknowledgment: To the authors and researchers on the internet who do all the hard work. Source: ZioPedia – All There Is To Know About Zionism Powered by Joomla! Generated: 6 September, 2007, 16:34

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

The fraud of the "chosen ones"

March 4, 2013

Zionists design myth of jewish genome to usurp palestine

By Jim W. Dean

They perpetrated the fraud solely to support the bogus biblical claim to Palestine which was anchored in their being a separate people. This distinguished them from all others because they claimed a land title in their blood. They bet the farm on this DNA proof of purchase, a God given bar coded passport to the Palestine. Dr. Ehaik just erased the bar code. It was just stamped on anyway, because it was never in the blood.

Related Interviews:

    ‘Zionists dictate policy to Harper govt.’
    ‘Many people find Zionism unacceptable’

On Decemever 14, 2012, Dr. Eran Elhaik turned almost two generations of Jewish genome research upside down. But he went even further. The young Israeli-Ameican geneticist has charged former researchers with academic fraud, and he has the research to back it up.

How could those those eminent Jewish scientist before him have been so wrong? Easy says Dr. Elhaik, “First these researchers decided what conclusions they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it.” I was not bashing Jewish scientists. What Elhaik has described is a slam dunk fraud.

But why? Why would Jews who take such pride in the academic achievement risk exposing themselves to a group deception which was bound to be discovered later? Dr. Elhaik does not delve into the quicksand of the politics, but I will gladly do so.

They perpetrated the fraud solely to support the bogus biblical claim to Palestine which was anchored in their being a separate people. This distinguished them from all others because they claimed a land title in their blood. They bet the farm on this DNA proof of purchase, a God given bar coded passport to the Palestine. Dr. Ehaik just erased the bar code. It was just stamped on anyway, because it was never in the blood.

Why, why did they do it? The second half of the answer not revealed in his research was that you had a bunch of atheist, communist Jews shoot their way into taking over the Land with the sole moral cover that ‘God gave it us only’.

    Before I had a bookcase of Judacia in my library I must say I was a bit suspicious of these atheist Jews whipping out God’s dual land title and passport. It was propaganda of course. It always was. And the story for another day is why did an entire academic community who should have known better, cower down and debase themselves in their own community by allowing the fraud to not only be birthed, but continued?

Arthur Koestler’s The Thirteen Tribe was a major influence in cracking the fraud. It was published in the day when Zionist propagandist were very savvy in not attacking an esteemed Jewish author. They had no fear from the academic community, already neutralized, and Kostler’s book did not generate a moral tipping point challenge to the Zionist false claim on the Land.

    Dr. Elhaik literally nails the fraudsters to the cross, “….[they] assumed that the Jews constitute a group that is genetically isolated from other nations.”…That’s because Jews were never genetically isolated, making all those other studies fatally flawed and very often contradictory.

I was wondering what weapon of mass destruction that the Jewish Lobby bullies would unleash upon the young Israeli-American geneticist. I expected to be reading about Alan Dershowitz denouncing him as a self hating Jew, when actually that is what Dershowitz is. He and Abe Foxman compete for the most negative Jewish stereotype/best bully competition award annually.

But there has been no attack. The 32 year old Dr.Elhaid is getting the Arthur Koestler treatment, in spades. What do I mean? Well, his research paper was published by the Oxford University Press, in the prestigious journal Genome Biology and Evolution. But do you think a bunch of savvy Zionist propagandists are going to worry about the mass public ever hearing a thing about his research? Of course not. And are these same pretend-a-Jews going to risk giving his work a 100 times more exposure by attacking him publicly?

    Let’s get back to Dr. Elhaik hammering the nails in, “First these researchers decided what conclusion they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it…It is my impression that their results were written before they began the research. First they shot the arrow – and then the painted a bull’s-eye around it.”

Take a moment to ponder what he said there, folks. Does that sound like someone trembling in fear of Jewish Lobby power in America, or someone thinking that his career is over and committing hari-kari? No. That ‘painted a bull’s-eye around it’ was not an off the cuff remark, but one he had chosen to use in a Haaretz interview. This is a young man who is NOT standing on the shoulders of the fraudsters who have gone before him. On the contrary he wants to stand on their academic bones by exposing them, and he has.

    More from his Haaretz interview, “The various groups of Jews in the world today do not share a common genetic origin. We are talking here about groups that are very heterogeneous and which are connected solely by religion…[the] genome of European Jews is a mosaic of ancient peoples and its origin is largely Khazar.”

Now onto some of the science highlights. Dr. Elhaik’s research shows that the dominant element in the genetic makeup of European Jews is Khazar. For Central European Jews it is 38%, while for East Europeans it is 30%. To that you can add his findings that in both groups their genome is mostly Western European. Surprise, surprise.

The Roman empire is the dominant lineage there, those that settled on the frontier, like retired soldiers, and the locals with whom they produced families. There were some Jewish merchants there as Elhaik did find some Middle Eastern roots which he suspects are Mesopotamian and a bit of biblical Israel.

But here comes the slam dunk…the Israel connection is such a tiny part of their overall genome that it cancels out their DNA title claim to the Land. The good doctor would not wander into this swamp but I will, by calling a spade a spade. What Dr. Elhaik has discovered folks is a ‘reverse holocaust’, the inventing of huge numbers of pseudo-Jews who have no more a blood claim to the land of Palestine than I do, even if I converted.

What I have just stated in no way challenges a religious or cultural affiliation. But as we all know, most Jews are not religious, including in Israel where way more than most are not. Subtracting that, then all you have is the tribe, the DNA, which unites them to a shared history of persecution. But that folks, is now all gone. Poof…gone.

Who among use does not have some genetic make up of a people who had suffered in ancient times, even numbers of different peoples, five or ten different ones? Why should we allow the pretend-a-Jews to send all of our gene pool to the back of the historical suffering bus as Club Med ancestors who enjoyed the ‘all inclusive’ treatment. I find that just a bit too convenient.

So these ‘Jews’, are they then just a gang, united to be against all those not in the gang? Have they invented the whole story in a way like gang members take an oath and defend territory? And is that not where Herzl and others before him saw an opening, that the Land could be a territory bond to unite Jews who were always fighting like cats and dogs amongst each other?

And is not the 2000 years of persecution claimed mostly by those who are not really descended from those actual people? Who really has holocausted whom here, and why? We had Golda Meir’s instant holocausting of the Palestinian people with her infamous, “There are no Palestinian people.”

Is this not poetic justice from Dr. Elhiak, that he brings us scientific proof of there being no biblical Jewish people as such as they have presented themselves? And does this not also make a fraud of the historical ‘anti-semite’ smear, by a people who aren’t even semites?

I think it might be time to start setting things straight on the Founding Myths. I must admit that I never expected to get a free ticket to the truth from a smart young Iaraeli doctor from John Hopkins who has his moral rudder deep in the water. He is not a gangster, whoever his ancestors were. We call this…leadership, with maybe a touch of Moses parting the Founding Myth waters for those who want to walk through to the other side.

We shall now see if others choose to be free, or to run with the gang. The militant Israelis, they always knew this day was coming. That is what their nukes have been for, always. They knew. They never believed it themselves.

Jim W. Dean comes from an old military family dating back to the American Revolution. His father was a WWII P-40 and later P-51 Mustang fighter pilot. Jim’s mother was a WWII widow at 16, her first husband killed with all 580 aboard when the SS Paul Hamilton, an ammunition ship with 7000 tons of explosives aboard, was torpedoed off the coast of Algiers. He has appeared on PBS most recently on the Looking for Lincoln documentary with Prof. Henry Lewis Gates and lectured at the Army Command and General Staff School at Fort Gordon. His current writing focus is on national security, intelligence, black and psyops, military/Intel history including personal video archives, and the current wars.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

The myth of the Jewish people

February 22, 2013
By Jamal Kanj

Founding myths of IsraelThe Invention of the Jewish People is a book written by Shlomo Sand, an Israeli professor of history at the University of Tel Aviv.

The author wasn’t probing a belief system but Zionist fabrications of a spurious common lineage for people of the Jewish faith.

Sand argues that the idea of Jews having a common ethnic identity is implausible because, as with Christianity and Islam, Judaism was originally a “proselytising religion”.

The notion of Judaism as a “race”, rather than a religion of various races, is without foundation.
The results of a recently published study by Israeli-American geneticist Dr Eran Elhaik at John Hopkins University have scientifically and genetically validated Sand’s research.

Modern political Zionism, which otherwise rejects the Christian Bible, adopted the untested story of “Jewish exile” to establish a mythical linkage between European Jews and the Middle East.

The idea of a “nation race” was progressively developed and reinforced over centuries among segregated Jewish communities in Europe.

With the rise of German nationalism in the 19th century, Jewish historian Heinrich Graetz “retrospectively” crafted a discrete identity for the ghettoized people –  mapping their origin to an old kingdom and wandering exiles.

The exiles tales transpired from a Christian myth of “divine punishment” imposed on Jews for rejecting the new religion.

The parable is likely to have originated from the Old Testament story of Jews wandering the desert for disobeying God and worshipping a golden calf.

Christians propagated the concept of exile to lure “disobeying” Jews to the new religion, becoming their saviour from another eternal banishment.

Modern political Zionism, which otherwise rejects the Christian Bible, adopted the untested story of “Jewish exile” to establish a mythical linkage between European Jews and the Middle East.

But Jewish history tells us that the Romans did not expel the original Jews from Palestine when they crushed the Simon bar Kokhba revolt in 136 AD but instead barred them only from city of Jerusalem – and even then they were allowed to visit it during Tisha B’Av, the annual fasting day on the ninth day of the month of Av in the Hebrew calendar.

Under Christianity and during the Roman Empire a large number of native Jews converted to Christianity and, with the advent of Islam, most adopted the new religion and assimilated under the new power.

Followers of the first monotheistic religion continued to have a presence in Palestine hundreds of years after the waning of the Roman Empire.

The last recorded history of an autonomous Jewish entity was under the tutelage of the Persian Empire in 614 AD, before it was dismantled by Byzantine forces in 625 AD.

A little over 10 years later Palestine was conquered by the Muslims and became part of the new Arab and Muslim community.

Under Christianity and during the Roman Empire a large number of native Jews converted to Christianity and, with the advent of Islam, most adopted the new religion and assimilated under the new power.

In addition to the descendants of the Canaanites, the original denizens before patriarch Abraham’s arrival from Mesopotamia, Sand concludes that today’s Muslim and Christian Palestinians are actually the true progenies of the original Jews.

So if there was no exile, where did European Jews come from?

Sand suggested that most of today’s Jews did not originate from the Middle East.

He argues that the European (Ashkenazi) Jewish ancestry can be traced back to the Caucasus region.

Founded on a mélange of myths and manufactured historical tales, Israel has failed the archaeological test of time and is now exposed by DNA science.

In the 8th century, the Khazars’ subjects and subordinate tribes experienced the largest religious conversion in the history of Judaism.

The recent study by John Hopkins geneticist Dr Elhaik confirms that the common genome structure of the European Jew gravitated towards an origin in old Khazaria.

“The majority of Jews do not have Middle Eastern genetic component,” he told Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

Founded on a mélange of myths and manufactured historical tales, Israel has failed the archaeological test of time and is now exposed by DNA science.

Today’s genetics prove unequivocally that in 1948 “the children of the original Jews” were replaced by 8th century converts with no roots in the Middle East.

A version of this article was first published in the Gulf Daily News. The version here is published by permission of Jamal Kanj

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!


December 28, 2012

Who are these guys and how did they end up in Israel anyhow? Thisparticular group is offended by the presence of a female news reporter.

ED Noor: They sneeringly refer to themselves as “the Tribe” but accuse all non Jews of anti semitism should they dare to do so. In the past I have done work on the Khazars but today I present a review of Chapter Eight, THE KHAZARIAN CONNECTION, THE SEARCH FOR ASHKENAZI ORIGINS, from Harrell Rhome’s 2011 book, From The Temple To The Talmud, Exploring Judaic Origins, History, Folklore and Tribal Traditions.

What I have done is added videos, images, notes, links, and just enhanced the original piece.

An excellent opener is to listen to the esteemed educator Sheik Imran Hosein speak on the Khazars.
These Khazars will be pushing humanity towards destruction at an even faster and more frenetic pace in the coming year; all indications otherwise are not encouraging.
Every once in awhile it is a good idea to study anew the mindset of those who wish to eliminate us from the planet, or enslave us. Getting another insight into their origins always helps. Especially when you can see how those ancient and hidden techniques are now being applied today using modern methodologies as well as the ancient ones, driven by the ancient systems that have basically remained unchained over the millenia whilst wreaking havoc on all others.
Arthur Koestler’s review of the above is an enlightening, educational reminder of just what we are dealing with ~ the Tribe, and yes, they are all members and they all know, on some level, just what is what.
For those of you still learning about the Jewish people, this is an excellent start. For many it is a reminder…. and for others just plain history that they would rather the rest of us never learn about. Chinese Jews? Japanese Jews? Yemini and Ethiopian Jews?
And then there is the simple question that begs to be asked:
Should the proper and politically (in)correct name for the upstart state Israel actually be “New Khazaria”?
Lastly I apologize for it taking so long to get this out but…. There was bad code in the original work and it has taken me seven attempts to post … each attempt taking at least an hour to load images etc. Hopefully if I divide this in two it might work.
By Arthur Koestler
The Jews of our times fall into two main divisions: Sephardim and Ashkenazim.

The Sephardim are descendants of the Jews who since antiquity had lived in Spain (in Hebrew Sepharad) until they were expelled at the end of the fifteenth century and settled in the countries bordering the Mediterranean, the Balkans, and to a lesser extent in Western Europe. They spoke a Spanish-Hebrew dialect, Ladino, and preserved their own traditions and religious rites. In the 1960s, the number of Sephardim was estimated at 500,000.

The Ashkenazim, at the same period, numbered about eleven million. Thus, in common parlance, Jew is practically synonymous with Ashkenazi Jew.” (Page 181).
In Mr. Koestler’s own words,
“The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the cruelest hoax which history has ever perpetrated.”

The history of the Ashkenazi Jews was widely known and appreciated in the former Soviet Union. Ashkenazi militants traced the area where the Turkic Khazars originated before their migration to Southern Russia to Birobidjan, an Eastern Siberian area as big as Switzerland bordered by the Amur River, by China and Mongolia. Around 1928 they started building settlements with the Soviet government’s help and in 1934 the Autonomous Republic (Okrug) of Birobidjan Yevrei came into being with official languages of Yiddish and Russian. It is still there as an Autonomous Republic to this day, offering the only historically legitimate settlement area for Ashkenazi Jews willing to exercise their “right to return”.
Make the primary Khazarian connection.
A significantly large number of the folk called Jews are not Semitic in origin, and their ancestors never set foot in old Palestine.
For over a millennium, an originally Asiatic tribe has had considerable, some say undue, influence on the course of world affairs, perhaps more than any other ethnic group. Who are they? Few, if any other cultures have impacted the world through the ages like this people. Their real name almost faded away along with their once mighty empire of Khazaria.
In contrast, the people called Khazars did not disappear at all..
They underwent a convenient identity change,
creating a unique designation for themselves.
They became the “Jews of Eastern Europe”, the so-called and self-styled Ashkenazim, adopting and adapting a Semitic Hebrew heritage that was never really theirs. It was under this new name that they entered Europe.
“Jews are the most intelligent people in the world, so if it benefits them to change their names, they do so. That’s all there is to it. They mix in your society which is plenty corrupt….” ~ Harold Rosenthal Interview.
Quite naturally, one of the first questions some readers ask is why there are so few books on Khazarian culture and history?
In addition to being ignored and somewhat suppressed, there are reasons of a more scholarly nature. Douglas M. Dunlop, whose study preceded Arthur Koestler’s, was one of the first modern scholars to directly address this little-known saga.
ED Noor: I suggest another reason for the clandestine nature of this group being so well kept from the eyes of the world is ownership of media and the historical revisionism by those who rewrote or recorded it as the case may be. In most cases, the reviled historical revisionists of today are doing no more than correcting what was already corrupted.
“A continuous account of the Khazars was in fact given by the Cambridge historian J. B. Bury, in a chapter of his History of the Eastern Roman Empire [London, 1912]. This may be taken as the best account available, though there are others, besides a great number of monographs on various aspects of the subject and incidental references in modern books.

“The chief reason why we are not more familiar with the Khazars appears to be neither the lack of intrinsic interest presented by their story nor the absence of material, but rather the difficulty of dealing with the existing sources ~ partly because they are written in a variety of languages, Greek, Arabic, Hebrew, Syriac, Armenian, Georgian, Russian, Persian, Turkish, and even Chinese, with which no one can be expected to be conversant at first hand; and partly because of the contradiction and obscurity of the data thus afforded.” ~ Dunlop, History of the Jewish Khazars, p. x.
This term is our second Khazarian connection.
A few points must be made about the word, Jew. It was originally spelled and pronounced very differently than today. The meaning was Judean, i.e., someone from Judea, a small subsection of ancient Palestine. In its beginning, this meant nothing necessarily religious. It was a simple geographical designation, but things have changed.
The modern word Jew is a “secondary usage”, and did not take on its current meaning or pronunciation until the 1700s.
Through this adaptation and misusage, the Khazars took on the special mantle and alleged heritage (in truth, mostly mythological anyway) of an ancient coalition of Semitic tribes, sometimes called Habiru Sagaz (“raiders from across the river”), Hebrews or Israelites.
Israel means “chosen of El” (one of several deities mentioned in Genesis), though some say its roots come from Egypt, denoting Isis, Ra and El, the same place they borrowed and adapted their Yahu/Yahweh ethnocentric deity. Whatever the case may be, Israelite, like Judean, was used at one time or another by several tribes who migrated around the area.
But wherever the alleged bloodline rights to any purportedly “promised lands” may lead, they never lead to non-Semitic Khazaria.

Khazars are neither the “Chosen Ones” nor the “Children of Israel” except in their own fantasies and desires!
The real roots of the ancient Semitic Middle Eastern tribes are quite hard to follow. In practical and provable historical terms, there are no pure and distinct bloodlines back to Old Testament times.
How can we follow bloodlines when we hardly know who some of those ancient folk really were? One need not explore too far into ancient history to realize how very little we actually know.
“Historical sequences are convoluted at best. The players are manifold and the events themselves become lost in the obscurity of antiquity.” ~ The Phoenix Journals.
For those who follow New Testament teachings, here is what Jesus said to the Talmudic cult of Pharisees over twenty centuries ago. There is a theme here, one of lies and deception. Modern “Judeo-Christians” (what an ultra misnomer!) seem obsessed with prophecies of one kind or another, but can they connect what is below with current events? 

Sadly, few seem willing or able to do so, choosing to believe “Jesus was a Jew” and that today’s Judaic Zionists are the “chosen people”.
No, that is not what your Bible says. There’s more if you want to find it, but these verses should really be enough. Make the connection.
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.” John 8:44-45.

“I know… the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan … which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie…. Revelation 2:9-10, 3:9.
Who is spoken of?
Who fits this profile today?
Is Jesus talking about the Khazar convert Jews who entered Europe a thousand years after he spoke?
If so, we could say this young Palestinian prophet, leading a resistance movement against the Pharisaic cult and conspiracy that ultimately killed him, provided a prescient look ahead.
While the Khazars are surely not the people of the New Testament, having merely appropriated this supposed heritage and mythos, they certainly match the Talmudists of old Palestine in cunning and guile. For hundreds of years, the Khazar Judaics have excelled in the teachings of the Talmud.
Unfortunately, their Talmudic schemes and machinations have largely succeeded.
For example,
a lot of modern Christianity
is little more
than Judaism for the goyim.

ED Noor: Please read my recent posts on the Scofield Bible and Christian Zionism for information on this and how they managed to take over American Christianity..
They say it best themselves.
“Judaism is not only the teaching of the synagogue, but also the doctrine of every ‘Christian Church’ in America. Through our propaganda the Church has become our most avid supporter. This has even given us a special place in society, their believing the lie that we are the ‘Chosen People’ and they, ‘Gentiles’.” ~ Harold Rosenthal Interview.
“History is always written generations after the event, when clouded fact and memory have all fused into what can be accepted as truth, whether it be so or not.” ~ Theodore White.
The authentic history of this obscure tribal group is imperative. Not only is the USA, indeed almost every western government, committed financially and militarily to defend the unjustly established State of Israel, as we painfully see, almost every Christian church in America promotes this Khazar Zionist nightmare regime.
The present-day reality of the Israeli ministate and its myriad of problems take on an entirely different meaning when seen in proper context, but first, we must lift the veil of obfuscation.
When the Khazarian connection is made, it truly begs the question.
Why do the American people support patently false land claims from a racial/tribal lineage that was never remotely from Palestine or anywhere else in the Mideast?
This is crucial in reviewing what are otherwise just little known facts about an obscure ancient Central Asian tribe.
As a result of media suppression and a dumbed-down educational system even at the university level, few Americans make the Khazarian connection.
American Muslims know the truth through their own news services such as Radio Islam, but most other Americans, especially Christians, seem either to know nothing or don’t care to know anything as it contradicts their religious beliefs.
Not only that,
many Jews
know or understand very little of this tale.
What force is powerful enough, not so much to rewrite history, but to write around it, virtually erasing significant traces or comments about the ferocious Khazar tribes, and their early impact on western culture and world history?
“God cannot alter the past,
but historians can” ~ Samuel Butler.
At its height, Khazaria consisted of a territory in West Central Asia and Eastern Europe encompassing over one million square miles, located between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea (which was once called the Chasarian Sea), and northwest to Kiev.
Why the historical blackout? Who are they? What happened to them? This is the subject of our paper.
Two maps show the Khazar Empire at the height of its power.

The Khazars were fierce and ferocious warriors. Both a well armed and armored heavy cavalryman and foot soldier are shown below.
The word, Hussar, for cavalryman, may have come from Khazar since the Turkish word for Khazar is Hazar.
ED Noor: Note that even back then they wore the payot or sidelocks that are still supposed to be worn by all Jews, not just the orthodox. For acceptance and immersion into other cultures, many do not grow them.

Khazar Jewish soldier today

Here are the facts as set forth, not only by the historians and books of the past, but by those in modern times. The works of Arthur Koestler, Benjamin Freedman, Douglas M. Dunlop, Kevin Brook, and more than a few others speak to these matters.
We see below what some present day Khazar descendants, called the Karay Turks, say about the origin of the name. They too are Khazar convert Jews, but do not follow the Talmud. Not just that; the Karay are very proud of their Turko-Asian heritage.
“Khazar is a Turkish word derived from the root, ‘kaz’, with the meaning of ‘gez’ (wander). In Anatolian Turkish, the term ‘khazar’ means ‘gezer’ (wanderer), and coincides with the meaning of a nomad who freely wanders around without any connection to one place.

Probably, this word took its final shape through an etymological transformation in the forms of ‘gezer’, ‘gazar’, ‘kazar’ and ‘hazar’. The word is ‘el-Hazar’ in Arabic, ‘Huzari’, ‘Kozar’ in Hebrew, ‘Gazari’, ‘Chazari’ in Latin, ‘Hazari’ in Georgian, ‘Huszar’ in Hungarian and ‘Ko-sa’, ‘ka-sat’ in Chinese.”

The Khazars, a migratory folk originating in eastern Asia and close kinsmen of the Huns and Mongols, trekked westward. In c.138, the Khazar tribe’s folk arrived in the area between the Caspian and the Black Seas, near several great rivers. There they established a tribal kingdom that grew in power and influence.
For well over four hundred years they ruled over an immense and lucrative empire south of the Russian territories, between the Black Sea and the Chasarian/Caspian Sea, reaching as far northwest as Kiev.
In its day, the Khaghanate (kingdom, empire, khanate) was larger and richer than any other country in Europe. Yes, Khazaria (Khazaran; Khuzaran; Arabic al-Kazara, Kusari; Hebrew Kuzarim), like later Russia, was both an Asian and a European nation. Their location was of key geopolitical importance. Europe was on the west, the Rus Verangians, descendents of the Vikings, on the north, all of Asia and the Silk Road to the east (but, from whence came the Mongols, their later downfall), plus Greek Christian Byzantium and the newly ascendant Islamic Arabs to the south.
Khazaria was a powerful regional military and trade power. They were commercial wizards of the first order, although those who had to pay the tolls on their seas, rivers and overland trade routes might rather have called them extortionists. Truth be known, the Khazars lived almost solely off this revenue. They produced nothing for export except Isinglass. Clothes, tools and virtually everything else came from outside the country.
ED Noor: Isinglass is a substance obtained from the dried swim bladders of fish. It is a form of collagen used mainly for the clarification of wine and beer. It can also be cooked into a paste for specialized gluing purposes. Originally made exclusively from sturgeon, especially Beluga sturgeon, until the 1795 invention by William Murdoch of a cheap substitute using cod. This was extensively used in Britain in place of Russian isinglass. The bladders, once removed from the fish, processed and dried, are formed into various shapes for use
Over time they created additional loot by conquering, oppressing and extorting taxes from over twenty-five nearby peaceful agricultural tribes. Khazaria produced very little. It was an empire almost solely supported by trade-related revenues. Of course, this mercantile mindset came with them into Europe, but it began a long time before that.

Exhibit at the Diaspora Museum, Tel Aviv ~ en:Beit Hatefutsot. The museum note says “A Jewish slave trader being presented to Boleslas of Bohemia“. Circa 972 AD.
Khazars were heavily involved in all kinds of international barter, including the slave trade ~ hence, the sex trade too, just as they are today. They were one of the better-known procurers and suppliers of Slavs, a people so exploited in this fashion that their very name came to mean slave. The Rus routinely sold Slav captives to the Khazars. This continued in their later migrations and machinations.
In the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries, Khazar descendents, along with Sephardic co-religionists, are the dominant players in shipping the black slaves from Africa to the Americas. In his History of the Jews, Solomon Grayzel clearly lays this out.
“One type of business carried on in the early Middle Ages by the Jews of Europe, namely the slave trade, requires a special word of explanation. The Jews were among the most important slave-dealers.

As inhabitants of western Germany pushed their way deeper and deeper into Central Europe, driving the Slavic inhabitants farther eastward and taking away their land, they brought back captives whom they sold to Jewish traders. The Jews, in turn, transported these slaves to other lands to be sold to Christian and Mohammedan masters.”
Another trade learned as Khazars and continued as Jews was that of the furrier. Marten, Sable and other fine furs (in addition to many other valuable products) came down the Volga via the Bulgars, and goods flowed all the way from Novgorod via the Dnieper, not to mention other centers via the Don and several more major waterways. Some main commodities were furs, hides, honey, flax, tar, cloth, grains, gold, silver, jewels and silks.
The Khazars made almost no cloth or clothes, getting them all through the mercantile networks. Old descriptions of Khazar clothing sound something like the Hasidim and others, featuring fur hats and long coats. Trade in many of these items continued to be dominated by the Khazars even after they migrated into Europe. For example, the fur business is often a Judaic enterprise even today.

How many species of fur bearing creatures are extinct or facing extinction so these men can wear these extremely expensive antiquated hats?
Of course, the dominant international diamond and jewel traders (thus they are involved with “blood diamonds”) are the Khazar Ashkenazi Hasidic Jews. While dominant in more than a few industries today, back in Khazaria and later in Europe, they were the chief players, sometimes the only players, in commercial enterprises such as brewing, and, of course, later in distilling. The early pioneers in manufacturing and marketing of alcoholic beverages were often Khazar Jews.
“In the ‘dark age,’ the commerce of Western Europe was largely in Jewish hands, not excluding the slave trade, and in the Carolingian cartularies Jew and Merchant are used as almost interchangeable terms.” Dr. Cecil Roth, World History of the Jewish People.
Minister Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam were lambasted and criticized by the Zionist dominated media for daring to publish, with heavy documentation, the history of Jews and the African slave trade. The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews (by an anonymous writer or group of writers) is quite well researched and very difficult to refute.

ED Noor: When I visited Jewtown in Kochi, Kerala, India, several years ago I found it deserted. and was told that the traders had left once Israel was founded but had lived there, in the heart; of Indian spice growing land for a thousand years. I was also informed that many Jews had moved up into the Western Mountains were they took over the lucrative spice, sandalwood and tea plantations.

Bene Israel Family at Bombay, circa 1900. Jewish Encyclopedia, 1901-1906

Cochin (Kochi) Jews, circa 1900. Jewish Encyclopedia, 1901-1906.
Ezra Joseph Gubbay
The Sephardic Jews were among the earliest sea traders, sailors, shippers and ship owners, as were their Semitic cousins, the Phoenicians. With co-religionists in almost every port in the world, they got the goods reliably delivered when international shipping was an extremely risky business, and before the modern insurance industry began.

ED Noor: Please note that, per agenda of divide and conquer utilized so effectively by today’s Khazars Zionists, little or no mention is ever made of the white slave trade, primarily Irish, to America!

Above, Irish sugar slaves were usually simply worked to death as part of the Irish genocide.. Most information found on slavery pertains to black slaves only, or, in m,ore modern incidences white sexual slavery.

heir involvement in the profitable human cargo trade was a natural development of their extensive trade and shipping connections. Both Sephardis and Ashkenazis were prominent in the slave trade. Today, it is the lucrative and despicable sex slave trade that holds their interest.

Make the Khazarian connection.

Some of their main families, exemplified by the Rothschilds as well as other Illuminati bloodlines, consisted of slavers, war profiteers and exploiters, then as now.

White sex slaves
Before moving on, we say a few words about the Khazar monarchy. Its ruler was the Khaghan, an emperor or high king (related to Khan, also rendered as khakhan, khaqan, etc.). He was a ceremonial figure of sorts, and a spiritual leader as well. Curiously, this old Khazar title may still be with us in the Judaic name, Kagan. The Khaghan was head of state, but not head of government.
Another important character was the Begh, a Shogun-like grand vizier or generalissimo figure. This is a curious job. As would a Prime Minister, along with a council of ministers, the Begh conducted everyday business, yet was also the military commander-in-chief. But at other times, he seems more like a co-monarch, sometimes styled as the Khaghan Begh. Of course, this “begs” the question and makes the relationship even harder to fathom. In Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan and other places, the old title is still used for some tribal leaders. Koestler tells us more.
“All this does not explain the startling division of divine and secular power, apparently unique in that period and region. As Bury wrote: ‘We have no information at what time the active authority of the Chagan was exchanged for his divine nullity, or why he was exalted to a position resembling that of the Emperor of Japan, in which his existence, and not his government, was considered essential to the prosperity of the State.’ A speculative answer to this question has recently been proposed by Artamonov.

He suggests that the acceptance of Judaism as the state religion was the result of a coup d’état, which at the same time reduced the Kagan, descendant of a pagan dynasty whose allegiance to Mosaic Law could not really be trusted, to a mere figurehead.

“This is a hypothesis as good as any other ~ and with as little evidence to support it. Yet it seems probable that the two events ~ the adoption of Judaism and the establishment of the double kingship ~ were somehow connected. Before the conversion the Kagan was still reported to play an active role ~ as, for instance, in his dealings with Justinian. To complicate matters further, the Arab sources sometimes refer to the ‘Kagan’ when they clearly mean the ‘Bek’ (as ‘kagan’ was the generic term for ‘ruler’ among many tribes), and they also use different names for the Bek….”
In some ways, the supreme monarch’s role seems ceremonial and minimal, but this is not consistent, and may have varied, depending on the personality and goals of those who came to the throne. As we shall see, some played the dominant role in diplomatic affairs. We also know that the Khaghan made a required ceremonial appearance before the people every four months, but the record is vague about other functions.
When he appeared before the people, did he grant audiences? Did he make proclamations? Alas, we do not know.
We might assume he had some sort of veto power if the Begh failed in his tasks. This curious relationship was not always consistent. The Begh was the supreme military leader, but some Khaghans were known to take the field at the head of their troops. Other than the curious “co-rulers”, Khazaria was, more or less, a traditional monarchy. It also had a shamanistic priesthood, a warrior caste (probably the Begh came from this class) and an aristocracy (the “White Khazars” or Aq Khazars), but we know little more.
As the Khaghan was also a spiritual leader, some strange rituals grew up around him and his role. Koestler tells the tale.
“There is no evidence of the Khazars engaging in religious persecution, either before or after the conversion to Judaism. In this respect they may be called more tolerant and enlightened than the East Roman Empire or Islam in its early stages.

“On the other hand, they seem to have preserved some barbaric rituals from their tribal past. We have heard Ibn Fadlan on the killings of the royal gravediggers. He also has something to say about another archaic custom regicide: ‘The period of the king’s rule is forty years. If he exceeds this time by a single day, his subjects and attendants kill him, saying ‘His reasoning is already dimmed, and his insight confused’.

“…Istakhri has a different version of it: When they wish to enthrone this Kagan, they put a silken cord round his neck and tighten it until he begins to choke. Then they ask him: ‘How long doest thou intend to rule?’ If he does not die before that year, he is killed when he reaches it.”

“Bury is doubtful whether to believe this kind of Arab traveler’s lore, and one would indeed be inclined to dismiss it, if ritual regicide had not been such a widespread phenomenon among primitive (and not-so-primitive) people. Frazer laid great emphasis on the connection between the concept of the King’s divinity, and the sacred obligation to kill him after a fixed period, or when his vitality is on the wane, so that the divine power may find a more youthful and vigorous incarnation.
Sir James Frazer wrote a special treatise on these lines on “The Killing of the Khazar Kings” (Folklore, XXVIII, 1917). It speaks in Istakhri’s favour that the bizarre ceremony of ‘choking’ the future King has been reported in existence apparently not so long ago among another people, the Kok-Turks. Zeki Validi quotes a French anthropologist, St Julien, writing in 1864.”

“When the new Chief has been elected, his officers and attendants … make him mount his horse. They tighten a ribbon of silk round his neck, without quite strangling him; then they loosen the ribbon and ask him with great insistence: “For how many years canst thou be our Khan?” The king, in his troubled mind, being unable to name a figure, his subjects decide, on the strength of the words that have escaped him, whether his rule will be long or brief.”

“We do not know whether the Khazar rite of slaying the King (if it ever existed) fell into abeyance when they adopted Judaism, in which case the Arab writers were confusing past with present practices as they did all the time, compiling earlier travelers’ reports, and attributing them to contemporaries.

However that may be, the point to be retained, and which seems beyond dispute, is the divine role attributed to the Kagan, regardless whether or not it implied his ultimate sacrifice. We have heard before that he was venerated, but virtually kept in seclusion, cut off from the people, until he was buried with enormous ceremony. The affairs of state, including leadership of the army, were managed by the Bek (sometimes also called the Kagan Bek), who wielded all effective power.”
As previously observed, this is all a bit frustrating due to its inconsistency. Some Khaghans not only led their troops, but presided over sensitive diplomatic negotiations and treaties. The Khazar king was also a spiritual leader, so we examine this dimension next.
“The Chasars professed a coarse religion, which was combined with sensuality and lewdness.” ~ Heinrich Graetz, History Of The Jews, 1892.
Like kindred tribes, their old religion was primitive shamanism sometimes even involving human sacrifice. But, change was in the air. History records that in the middle of the Eighth Century (c.740), the Khaghan, along with the Begh, their ministers and close advisors, made a carefully calculated geopolitical decision about a state religion.
This had become a sticking point in foreign affairs.
While fighting Muslims in crucial battles at certain times, the Khazars also had many of the Islamic faith, not only within their borders, but as mercenaries in their multicultural army. Bulan even have made a half-hearted conversion from shamanism to Islam (c.737), making the religious situation even more confusing. Apparently, if it happened at all, it was largely symbolic, involving only the Khagan, who was said to have quarreled with the Imams about their strict dietary rules.
“At first sight, the statements that the Khaghan became a Muslim in A.D. 737 and Judaized three years later are, to say the least, remarkable.” Dunlop, p. 86.

There was apparently an ongoing Christian presence. Certainly they must have interacted with Christian merchants and maybe missionaries and other travelers on their trade routes.
An Armenian bishop is said to have preached in the area around 682. While he likely converted a few, there is no record of a diocese being established or priests coming to start mission churches. However, this was right in the middle of two Khazar-Arab wars, so the timing was not ideal. As to how deep the Christian roots were planted is a wide-open question. But, apparently, some did get baptized, and there are ongoing references to Christian Khazars.
“The Khazars evidently had the qualities of a Jack-in-the-Box, derived from their Turkish origin, or Mosaic faith, or both. Cedrenus [the chronicler] also says the name of [a] defeated Khazar leader was Georgius Tzul. Georgius is a Christian name; we know from an earlier report that there were Christians as well as Muslims in the Khaghan’s army”. Koestler, pp. 129-130.
Essentially, all of Europe owes an unacknowledged debt to Khazaria. The Khazars repelled two massive Islamic jihads from the powerful and aggressive Abbasid Caliphate. Without a doubt, in due course, they would have continued into Europe.
If you have not realized it yet, Europe has always been and still is the target of the global Islamic world jihad, bringing about a whole planet in submission to Islam, Allah, the Koran and Shariah Law.
ED Noor: The above sentiment is from the author and does show the more international and ancient aspects of the Khazar/Jew struggle with the Arab and Christian peoples.
The first Khazar-Arab war lasted from 642 until 653; the second from 732 to 737. In both endeavors, they repelled the Muslim invaders, and the Abbasid Caliphate turned its eyes elsewhere.
So as we see, the Judaic conversion came in a time of war and upheaval as Khazaria was surely and certainly beset by the Muslim armies.
Turning Christian was out of the question. Not only would this have put them in a compromising position with both the Vatican and Byzantium, but more importantly, would have insulted the Muslims. What were they to do?
Bulan, the Begh and their ministers set out to remedy the situation. While some writers say it never really happened, they reportedly brought in Greek philosophers, Christian Bishops and evangelists, Islamic Mullahs and Faqihs, and rabbis from Baghdad and Babylon for debates and dissertations about their respective faiths.
Whatever the facts may be, the decision was already made. Indeed, we must opine that Judaism did not just suddenly appear right before the great debate.
According to several sources, a rabbi was already resident at the Khaghan’s court. This may reflect an earlier date (c.721), for the beginning of Judaic influence at the top levels of power. This was through oriental Jews, from already existing communities like those in Persia, Baghdad and Byzantium.
While the decision to convert was made behind the scenes, for the sake of appearances, the other religions were brought in for the famous theological dispute.
So, after an appropriate deliberation period, the Khaghan, and thus his nation, converted to Judaic Talmudism. Rabbis were imported for the appropriate rites. Hundreds, maybe thousands of the pagan shamans and members of the elite classes were mass ordained (some then, some later) as Cohens or Levites (Hebrew priestly caste and sub-caste).
It is to be expected that some of the rabbis, as well as other oriental Judaics and their families, stayed on to nurture the faith, training lay teachers and rabbis from among the Khazars. And, of course, they must have intermarried, at least to some degree.

While this could mean that a drop or two of semi-Semitic blood entered the gene pool, it was minimal.
Moreover, oriental Judaic Sephardic bloodlines were already mixed and mottled, e.g., with Canaanites, Edomites, Idumeans and a host of other regional tribes from there to Egypt and up and down the Arabian Peninsula.
Essentially, the Sephardim
are Arab Jews
or Judaized Arabs,
whichever you prefer.
While neither ethnic group really wants to hear about it, Jews and Arabs are intermixed. Did you know that Yemen, like old Khazaria, once had a monarch and upper classes that converted?
Beginning c.390, it became a Judaic kingdom for a time, called Himayar. Like in other parts of ancient Arabia, there were already Judaic tribes of one kind or another living there. Some of Muhammad’s early jihads were against Arab Jews since most of them refused to follow the new prophet.
John Tiffany had some interesting quotations and comments in his Barnes Review article on the Khazars, including an account by an Arab historian which contains some interesting information.
“According to a Moslem account found in al-Bakri’s Book of Kingdoms and Roads, written in the 11th. Century, it [the conversion] happened in this way:

“‘The reason for the conversion to Judaism of the king of the Khazars, who had previously been a pagan, is as follows. He had adopted Christianity. Then he recognized its falsehood and discussed this matter, which greatly worried him, with one of his high officials. The latter said to him,

“‘Oh king, those in possession of sacred scriptures fall into three groups. Summon them and ask them to state their case, then follow the one who is in possession of the truth.’

“So he sent to the Christians for a bishop. Now there was with the king a Jew, skilled in argument, who engaged him (the bishop) in disputation. He asked the bishop: ‘What do you say of Moses, the son of Amran, and the torah which was revealed to him?’

“The bishop replied: ‘Moses is a prophet and the torah speaks the truth.’ Then the Jew said to the king: ‘He has already admitted the truth of my creed. Ask him now what he believes in.’

“So the king asked him and he replied, ‘I say that Jesus the Messiah is the son of Mary, he is the Word, and he has revealed the mysteries in the name of God.’

“Then the Jew said to the king of the Khazars: ‘He preaches a doctrine which I know not, while he accepts my propositions.’ But the bishop was not strong in producing evidence.

“Then the king asked for a Muslim, and they sent him a scholarly, clever man who was good at arguments. But the Jew hired someone who poisoned him on the journey, and he died. And the Jew succeeded in winning the king for his faith, so that the embraced Judaism.’ ~ Tiffany, John, “The Khazars ~ Non-Semitic Jews,” The Barnes Review, Vol. III, No. 7, July 1997.
The coming of the Talmudic religion to Khazaria began with the upper classes. It took time for the faith to spread among the common people. While it eventually did grow and flourish, in the beginning it was still in a multicultural milieu. For example, in a stance befitting its status at an international trade crossroads, and since mercenaries of many religions served in the Khazar military, a tolerance for Christianity and Islam continued. Perhaps the folk in more remote locations continued on with their shamanism, or as is done with most new religions, blended and incorporated the old beliefs with the new.
Dr. Koestler tells us a bit about the beginning of the decline of the empire in the mid to late 900s. But their new religion did not really decline at all. By that time, their Khazarian brand of Judaism was well entrenched. Even when the Kievan Rus were asserting their own sovereignty, and just before they stopped paying tribute to the Khaghan, the Khazars tried to prevent this by religiously recruiting the ruler. As history shows, this sometimes does the trick, but in the case of the Kievan Rus, it was not to be.
“The first non-Arab mention of Khazaria after the fatal year 965 seems to occur in a travel report by Ibrahim Ibn Jakub, the Spanish-Jewish ambassador to Otto the Great, who, writing probably in 973, describes the Khazars as still flourishing during his time. Next in chronological order is the account of the Russian Chronicle of Jews from Khazaria arriving in Kiev AD986 in their misfired attempt to convert Vladimir to their faith.” Koestler.
As we see, while Kiev was essentially treated as a fiefdom from which to extort tribute, many Khazars settled and lived there, long before the coming of the Rus. And even after the decline of their empire, there was still a significant presence. Kiev was commonly called the “City of the Jews”.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Israel Stands Alone as Zion Faces Destruction

August 14, 2012

Posted on August 13, 2012 by Rick Bronson

A recent report coming out of Israel via The Times of Israel shows the dilemma the wannabe conquerors find themselves in, considering the international awakening to the reality of Zionism. For the past 64 years, the Zionists have enjoyed the status as the victims of the German holocaust.

However now, thanks to our Creator and the internet, the peoples of the world, and most importantly, the peoples of the United States have become aware of the reality of Zionism and the fact that there are different sects of Jews, most notably those of Jesus Christ and then the Khazars, the evil corrupt Jews of money and power.
The Khazars have always been quite willing to sacrifice the Jewish people as surely as Jesus Christ himself was condemned by the Priests of the Sanhedrin. The fact is the Zionists believe themselves elite to every other life form upon this planet, including the American Christian.

The Zionists are infiltrated deep within our government and represent the heart of the insurgency bent on our destruction. But as they are being discovered, their power is diminishing, thus their present dilemma.

Part of the article from The Times of Israel states:

Obama does not want to intervene militarily before the presidential elections in November, and it is doubtful that he would act afterwards, runs the Israeli assessment, the TV report said. Obama may believe that the US can live with a nuclear Iran, but Israel cannot, the report quoted those in “Netanyahu’s circle” as saying.

The assertion here that the US would not be pulled into a conflict if Israel attacks Iran is erroneous to the extreme as Obama has already taken a knee and kissed the ring of Zion or he would not be President of the United States. Not to mention the fact that thanks to the traitors within our government, the US is bound by treaty contract to intervene.
The article’s next assertion claims:

As for presidential challenger Mitt Romney, he takes a more forceful position, but would probably not have the domestic support necessary to act in the first year of his presidency, if elected, and after that it would be too late.

Again erroneous, as Romney has not only taken a knee and kissed the ring of Zion, but has declared his intent to invade Iran for the Zionists. As for public support, if Romney is elected, it will be a consequence of the most blatant voter fraud since the days of Stalin and of course the consent of we the people will have been dismissed utterly.

No, the reason the Israelis find themselves in their current position is because the people of the United States are already in a revolution. And when we take back the wealth and power of our nation from the Zionists they will be right where they deserve to be and that is standing toe to toe on an even playing field with the peoples they have invaded and committed genocide upon for the last 64 years.

They do have over 200 nuclear warheads, but if they dare begin unleashing them all over the Middle East, they will be destroyed by Russia and China as their countries border the region. It is time that Zion be confronted and brought to justice.

God help we Americans and the peoples of the world to make sure they fight their own battle this time

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

‘When and How Was the Land of Israel Invented?’

May 30, 2012
Remember the ‘self-hating’ Jewish historian and author, Professor Shlomo Sand (Tel Aviv University), who pulled the rug underneath Zionist Jews in his 2009 book, ‘The Invention of the Jewish People’. Well, the good-old professor has just published a new anti-Semitic book, entitled ‘When and How Was the Land of Israel Invented?‘.

Dr. Sand proves once again that only a Jew can say such things and get away with the murder. His 2009 book had united the Israel-Firsters like Anita Shapira, Hillel Halkin, Jeffrey Goldberg, etc. They all condemned Shlomo Sand for challenging the Zionist myth about Jewish people.

Last year, the Zionist propagandists chased Gilad Atzmon for his book, The Wandering Who?.

In the past, Arthur Koestler’s book, ‘The Thirteen Tribe’, French philosopher Roger Garaudy’s book, ‘The Founding Myths of Israeli Politics, and professor Gilbert Achcar’s (University of London) book, The Arabs and the Holocaust: The Arab-Israeli War of Narratives, have similar message – that’s the Jews have no religious or historical right to occupy Palestine.

Zionism plundered the religious term ‘Land of Israel’ (Eretz Yisrael) and turned it into a geopolitical term. The Land of Israel is not the homeland of the Jews. It becomes a homeland at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th – only upon the emergence of the Zionist movement,” claims Dr. Sand.
Dr. Sand in his book, The Invention of the Jewish People, claimed that the vast majority of Western Jews are not from the Israelite (Hebrew) tribes – but people of different nationalities who converted to Judaism during 8th-10th century AC. This made Zionists claim over Palestine being promised to them by biblical God – void and null.
Zionists’ anti-Arab campaign usually ignors the fact that while 150,000 German Jews were actively took part in Nazi Army – 233,000 of the 550,000 Free French troops landing on the Mediterranean coast in Nazi-occupied France in November 1944 were North African Muslims.
Annette Herskovits, PhD, a Holocaust survivor and author, in her recent article, entitled, ‘Nazism, Zionism, and the Arab World‘ (Dissident Voice, May 21, 2012) has debunked several of Israel Hasbara (propaganda) myths about Holocaust, Zionism, Israel and the Arab Muslims.
As someone whose mother and father were murdered in Auschwitz, and who herself survived the Nazis’ barbarous nationalism thanks to the courage of a group of Catholics, Protestants, Communists, and Jews, I find the idea that defending the “Jewish state” supersedes all other human obligations both immoral and senseless. Nothing, not even the Holocaust, justifies Israel’s treatment of Palestinians or the continuing efforts of pro-Israel zealots to show Arabs and Muslims as less than human. Israel and its unconditional supporters are on a path leading to catastrophe not only for Palestinians, but in the not very long run, for Israel itself,” wrote Annette.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

The Palestinians as an “Invented People”

May 13, 2012
by Rich Siegel
Rich SiegelSaturday, May 12th, 2012
Palestinians protesting about hunger strikes
The name “Palestine” has been around for a long time. “Peleset”, transliterated from Egyptian hieroglyphics as “P-l-s-t”, is found in numerous Egyptian documents referring to a neighboring people or land starting from around 1150 BC. The “Philistine” States existed concurrently with the ancient Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, making up the coastal plain below Jaffa and south to Gaza. In the 5th Century BC Herodutus wrote of a “district of Syria, called Palestine”. About a century later, Aristotle described the Dead Sea in Meteorology and located it in Palestine:
Again if, as is fabled, there is a lake in Palestine, such that if you bind a man or beast and throw it in it floats and does not sink, this would bear out what we have said. They say that this lake is so bitter and salty that no fish live in it and that if you soak clothes in it and shake them it cleans them.

This writer has had the misfortunate of frequently engaging in debates with Zionists (a bad habit I need to kick!) who often tend to seize on small ideas. “When did the Palestinians ever have their own country?” In order to win such an argument one would have to reduce oneself to their terms, and produce a map that shows a country and borders: “Palestinian Kingdom, 1587- 1702”, and then let them present their map of ancient Israel and Judea, and then get into a wrestling match the winner of which would claim the territory for their own. Or perhaps the issue would be better settled the way the New York colony won Staten Island from New Jersey: with a boat race. If the goal is exclusivity, as it always has been with Zionism, then the only criterion in achieving it is winning, whether a war or a race.

There was no 17th century Palestinian Kingdom, or 18th or 19th. There were, prior to Allied victory in World War One and the League of Nations “mandates” which granted European powers control of the region, various provinces in a larger Ottoman empire, ruled from Istanbul (previously known as Constantinople, and before that, Byzantium), much as there are today various American states governed from Washington. Objectors will cry “Foul!”, as Americans are governed by Americans in Washington, whereas Arabs were governed by Turks, a different ethnic group with a different language. Fine. So I modify my comparison to the Spanish speaking Puerto Ricans governed from Washington, or the French speaking Quebecois governed from Ottawa. Neither the Puerto Ricans nor the French Canadians are being ethnically cleansed.

Prior to Zionism, there was no need for the Arabs of Palestine to focus on Palestinian identity. They were citizens of the Ottoman Empire. When, during the mandate years the British made contradictory promises to the Zionists and the Arabs, and the Arabs expected, and had the right to expect, eventual self-rule, it was certainly not a foregone conclusion that there was going to be an independent Palestine. Palestinians might well have been a part of a larger South Syria, or of a Greater Syria, and happily so. They certainly would not have been ethnically cleansed under those circumstances. The Arabs of Palestine have always had their own distinct Arabic dialect, and various other cultural attributes that set them apart from other regional Arab cultures, but that was never particularly relevant. Many various subcultures existed within the Ottoman Empire, and continued to exist within British and French mandates.

Interestingly, during the years of the Yishuv, the pre-Israeli-statehood Zionist community in Palestine, Jewish-Zionist settlers called themselves “Palestinians”. In this way, the Zionists ironically affirmed the thing that many of them wish now to deny: Palestinian identity.

In 1948, amid the massacres and military forced mass expulsions of the “nakba” (Arabic for catastrophe, the name commonly given to the events of 1948), when the state of “Israel” was declared, all of the Jews who had been calling themselves Palestinians became “Israelis”, and when the dust cleared, the Arabs who remained within the green line became “Arab Israelis”, like it or not. (It was not known until the state of “Israel” was declared, what it was to be named. “Zion” was considered as a possibility, but rejected, as the result would have necessitated referring to “Arab Israelis”, the Arab citizens of Israel, as “Arab Zionists”.)

The designation “Palestinian” was more actively embraced beginning in 1964, with the forming of the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization), this out of necessity, because a people who had been ethnically cleansed, who were in a state of shock and humiliation, and who were desperate to recover and regain what was rightfully theirs, found it useful to rally around symbols representing themselves: A name and a flag are two of the basics.

Golda Meir famously said in 1969, during her tenure as Israeli prime minister;

There were no such thing as Palestinians. When was there an independent Palestinian people with a Palestinian state? It was either southern Syria before the First World War, and then it was a Palestine including Jordan. It was not as though there was a Palestinian people in Palestine considering itself as a Palestinian people and we came and threw them out and took their country away from them. They did not exist.

Golda is actually right on this point and that point. I would not have been able to show her a map that says “Kingdom of Palestine” or “Grand Duchy of Palestine” or any of dozens of designations that might have satisfied her. But this I can say for sure:

There were human beings on that land, and they had been there all their lives, and their families for many generations before them down through the centuries. And many of them were actually descended from ancient Jews who later converted to Christianity and Islam, while our ancestors, Golda’s and mine- the Ashkenazi Jews, were converting to Judaism in the Khazar Kingdom on the shores of the Caspian Sea.

Golda actually knew when making this statement, the information which has become available to the general public in the decades since:

We Jews did come and throw them out and take their country away from them. It’s been thoroughly documented. It wasn’t when she made this statement in 1969. She was able to get away with it then. But since then an entire generation of Jewish-Israeli scholars, (and many others, but we Jews need to hear it from Jews first!) has carefully documented the ethnic cleansing of Palestine and presented the history that she personally knew, but actively hid and denied. She and her colleagues concealed the truth from Jewish supporters of Israel all over the world including my family, who taught me lies quite innocently, because they didn’t know any better.

In 1984 a book written by Joan Peters, entitled From Time Immemorial: The Origins of the Arab-Jewish Conflict over Palestine, was released to the world. The book claimed that the Palestinians were not resident in Palestine long-term, but were recent arrivals, having come to take advantage of economic opportunities in Palestine which were largely the result of Zionist Jewish settlement. What a perfect way for us Zionist Jews to massage ourselves (I was one at the time!) and drive a wedge between ourselves and the growing awareness about Palestine in the world around us! So it really was a “land without people for a people without a land”! Those Arabs were all immigrants! And how ungrateful that they hate us after all the opportunity we gave them! A wave of related claims surfaced among the Zionist community. An essay by Mark Twain describing his touring of a sparsely populated 19th century Palestine, was offered up into the mix of “Palestinian-denier” evidence. Twain, whose writing was full of humorous and ironic opposition to human bullshit, was no doubt rolling in his grave over this. And claims were often heard that prominent Palestinians, from Edward Said to Yassir Arafat, were “not really Palestinian”.

Enter another book, in 2003, The Case for Israel by Alan Dershowitz. In case 19 intervening years had given anyone a memory lapse since the publication of Peters’s book, Dershowitz borrowed heavily from same, giving the same statistics and making the same conclusions.

Enter yet another book, but this one very different: In Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, published in 2005, Norman G. Finkelstein exposed Peters’s statistics as fraudulent, and with that revelation both her argument and that of Dershowitz, collapsed.

However, the damage is done among those who wish to ignore Finkelstein, and there are many! “Isn’t he a holocaust denier?”, I’ve been asked. I respond: “No. His parents were holocaust survivors.” Zionists have long used a familiar tactic against those who challenge their propaganda: Defamation. And so the lies persist. This writer still has people putting From Time Immemorial in his face to prove their argument. They refuse to be embarrassed.

“Native” Gingrich and the “invented” Palestine
At the time of this writing (January 2012), the American public is being treated to an entertainment we get every four years: the run up to our presidential election. As the Democratic candidate will obviously be the incumbent, we are witnessing the Republican candidates claw at each other in their striving to win support for the Republican nomination. Enter a billionaire Jewish American Zionist named Sheldon Adelson, casino magnate and the 8th wealthiest American alive, who along with his wife has donated $10 million to candidate Newt Gingrich. Adelson, whose holdings include the Israeli newspaper Israel HaYom (Israel Today) made some interesting statements while in Israel at an Israel Media Watch event in 2010:
I am not Israeli. The uniform that I wore in the military, unfortunately, was not an Israeli uniform. It was an American uniform, although my wife was in the IDF and one of my daughters was in the IDF … our two little boys, one of whom will be bar mitzvahed tomorrow, hopefully he’ll come back– his hobby is shooting – and he’ll come back and be a sniper for the IDF.
All we (the Adelson family) care about is being good Zionists, being good citizens of Israel, because even though I am not Israeli born, Israel is in my heart.
Does it sound like this guy has “divided loyalties?” Maybe like the Jewish neocons in the Bush administration who got us to fight a proxy war for Israel in Iraq? No- you can’t say that! It would be “anti-Semitic”!
So is it any wonder that Newt Gingrich has made the utterly incorrect and profoundly idiotic statement that he has made about the Palestinians being an “invented” people? It has nothing to do with any education on the subject of the history, or any awareness of the current situation. It’s simply a question of wanting to win, and of reiterating nonsense he has heard in conversations with a very rich and generous supporter, nonsense which jives with the general impressions that Americans get from our Zionist-controlled media, and that no doubt circulate in Gingrich’s Republican circles. Does anyone think Gingrich has read Finkelstein? I doubt it! And if he did, would he turn down $10 million in favor of truth and justice?

The people native to the land of Palestine were not “invented”. It is indeed unfortunate that someone who is supposedly educated, and who has achieved position in life where he is poised to potentially become the next president of the United States, is putting forth such foolishness.


Beit Ommar West Bank – Ocuppied Palestine

Baby,I-Tunes, AND Palestine Online Store.
(This essay was originally published on

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!


March 26, 2012


This is an older find. I think this image was first posted in 2007. I thought it might be of interest to my readers, however. Chances are that, at the time of this particular battle, the Khazars had already switched over to Judaism.

Historian and author Michael A. Hoffman II of has unearthed this photo of a Ukrainian statue depicting “Ukrainian Prince Sviatoslav’s defeat of the Khazar army, 968 A.D. (note the hexagram on the Khazar soldier’s shield)”

The Magen David was used in Jewish Kabbalistic rituals in the Middle Ages, but only became universally ‘Jewish’ in the 19th century when adopted by the Zionist movement as their national symbol.


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

History Lessons

December 16, 2011

From kenny’s sideshow

History Lessons


“In Khazaria, sheep, honey, and Jews exist in large quantities.”
Descriptio Imperii Moslemici
(tenth century).

Dr. Ashraf Ezzat reminds us that the highest profile ‘invented’ people in history are the jews. Perhaps the highest profile ‘invented’ event in history is the holocau$t. Without an understanding of unvarnished history, how can we understand the present?

Just in case we may see an end to the internet as we know it, there are some pdf copies of important books that need to be saved for posterity. Buy them if you can afford it because they will be found in few libraries. If so inclined download while you can. Countering the myth of the ‘chosen ones’ is a basic tool in the battle to save humanity from the Khazarian deception.

Shlomo Sand and Arthur Koestler, both ‘jews,’ present impressive historical documentation refuting the tales of the Old Testament and any blood link between whatever Hebrews may have existed thousands of years ago to those of Israel today. One criticism of Sand may be that he has not delved into the actual history of the ‘holocaust’ and perpetuates the zionist exaggerations as evidenced by his statement “Today the descendants of the Jews of “Yiddishland” live mainly in the United States and Israel. The remains of millions of others are buried beneath the slaughterhouses constructed by Hitler in the twentieth century.” {page 277} That said, his work remains a must read.

Full book downloads:
The Invention of the Jewish People by Shlomo Sand

The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler

Excerpts from “The Invention of the Jewish People”

National mythology determined that the Jews—banished, deported or fugitive emigrants—were driven into a long and dolorous exile, causing them to wander over lands and seas to the far corners of the earth until the advent of Zionism prompted them to turn around and return en masse to their orphaned homeland. This homeland had never belonged to the Arab conquerors, hence the claim of the people without a land to the land without a people.

This national statement, which was simplified into a useful and popular slogan for the Zionist movement, was entirely the product of an imaginary history grown around the idea of the exile. Although most of the professional historians knew there had never been a forcible uprooting of the Jewish people, they permitted the Christian myth that had been taken up by Jewish tradition to be paraded freely in the public and educational venues of the national memory, making no attempt to rebut it. They even encouraged it indirectly, knowing that only this myth would provide moral legitimacy to the settlement of the “exiled nation” in a country inhabited by others.

History deals with books, not with things, a “patriotic” scholar might argue, having spent his or her entire life interpreting religious, governmental and ideological texts produced in the past by a paper-thin elite. This is true where the traditional study of the past is concerned. But the advent of anthropological history began, slowly but surely, to corrode the simplistic Zionist metahistories.

The construction of a new body of knowledge always bears a direct connection with the national ideology in which it operates. Historical insights that diverge from the narrative laid down at the inception of the nation can be accepted only when consternation about their implications is abated. This can happen when the current collective identity begins to be taken for granted and ceases to be something that anxiously and nostalgically clings to a mythical past, when identity becomes the basis for living and not its purpose—that is when historiographic change can take place. For now, it is difficult to predict whether the Israeli politics of identity will permit, in the early twenty-first century, the emergence of fresh paradigms for the investigation of the origins and history of Jewish faith communities.
No Jew who lives today in a liberal Western democracy would tolerate the discrimination and exclusion experienced by the Palestino-Israelis, who live in a state that proclaims it is not theirs. But Zionist supporters among the Jews around the world, like most Israelis, are quite unconcerned, or do not wish to know, that the “Jewish state,” because of its undemocratic laws, could never have been part of the European Union or one of Americas fifty states. This flawed reality does not stop them from expressing solidarity with Israel, and even regarding it as their reserve home. Not that this solidarity impels them to abandon their national homelands and emigrate to Israel. And why should they, seeing that they are not subjected to daily discrimination and alienation of the kind that Palestino-Israelis experience daily in their native country?
To understand current Zionist politics, replace the word “aliyah” with “diaspora.” Today Israel’s strength no longer depends on demographic increase, but rather on retaining the loyalty of overseas Jewish organizations and communities. It would be a serious setback for Israel if all the pro-Zionist lobbies were to immigrate en masse to the Holy Land. It is much more useful for them to remain close to the centers of power and communications in the Western world—and indeed they prefer to remain in the rich, liberal, comfortable “diaspora.”
But if it is senseless to expect the Jewish Israelis to dismantle their own state, the least that can be demanded of them is to stop reserving it for themselves as a polity that segregates, excludes, and discriminates against a large number of its citizens, whom it views as undesirable aliens.
The Jewish supra-identity must be thoroughly transformed and must adapt to the lively cultural reality it dominates. It will have to undergo a process of Israelization, open to all citizens. It is too late to make Israel into a uniform, homogeneous nation-state. Therefore, in addition to an Israelization that welcomes the “other,” it must develop a policy of democratic multiculturalism—similar to that of the United Kingdom or the Netherlands—that grants the Palestino-Israelis not only complete equality but also a genuine and firm autonomy. Their culture and institutions must be preserved and nurtured at the same time as they are brought into the centers of power of the hegemonic Israeli culture. Palestino-Israeli children should have access, if they wish it, to the heart of Israeli social and productive centers. And Jewish-Israeli children must be made aware that they are living in a state in which there are many “others.”
And now the last, perhaps the hardest, question of them all: To what extent is Jewish Israeli society willing to discard the deeply embedded image of the “chosen people,” and to cease isolating itself in the name of a fanciful history or dubious biology and excluding the “other” from its midst?

In the final account, if it was possible to have changed the historical imaginary so profoundly, why not put forth a similarly lavish effort of the imagination to create a different tomorrow? If the nation’s history was mainly a dream, why not begin to dream its future afresh, before it becomes a nightmare?
Shlomo Sand

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

The Palestinians? Hell, they’re an ‘Invented’ People!

December 11, 2011


‘An Illusion!’
“Does Newt Gingrich believe in a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Democratic and Republican administrations have adopted that framework, but Mr. Gingrich raised the possibility he might break with it, calling Palestinians an “invented” people and the current stalled peace process “delusional.”

His comments were made this week in an interview with the Jewish Channel, a cable service.
Discussing the origin of the State of Israel in the 1940s, Mr. Gingrich said, according to a transcript: “Remember there was no Palestine as a state. It was part of the Ottoman Empire. And I think that we’ve had an invented Palestinian people, who are in fact Arabs, and were historically part of the Arab community. And they had a chance to go many places.” (Whoaaaa!)…”

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian